Search the Lounge

Categories

« Call for Proposals for the Third Annual Equality Law Scholars’ Forum | Main | A Law School in Shreveport? »

May 21, 2019

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

James Grimmelmann

Apparently, SSRN doesn't consider every paper published in the Green Bag to be a "full
scholarly research paper[]." I received a similar email about my essay Renvoi and the Barber. It may not be a long paper (16 pages), but I certainly sweated every word and it makes, in my opinion at least, an original contribution to legal theory. I opened a support ticket a week ago to inquire on what basis SSRN thinks that it is not scholarship, but I have received no reply.

If it is any consolation, being placed in SSRN's "Other Papers" section seems more insult than injury. As long as you check the box to make them publicly available, the only material drawback is that Other Papers don't show up in SSRN search results. But who uses SSRN's own poor excuse for a search engine? Everyone I know either uses Google or browses papers by author.

Regular readers of blog comment sections will know that I agree fully with your critique of SSRN. I strongly recommend self-archiving, law-school hosting of faculty publications, and open alternatives like LawArXiv.

The comments to this entry are closed.

StatCounter

  • StatCounter
Blog powered by Typepad