Search the Lounge


« Hiring Announcement: Queen's University (Canada) | Main | Should Pediatric Practices Reject Families That Decline Vaccinations for Their Children? »

June 04, 2018


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Deep State Special Legal Counsel

This is exactly what baffles me about Civil guys. Sanctions this and sanctions that. Bunch of babies. Why don't you just try the case already? This is one big reason I never take Civil stuff. Refer it to my buddies and get a check in the end. Don't have to put up with this nonsense or blowing a Statute.


This was a dangerous move on the SG's part. It was just a few years ago when the SG (pre-Trump) made representations in oral argument to SCOTUS about how ICE - I think - operates. Post-decision, the SG filed a letter acknowledging the mistake but contending, essentially, 'no harm, no foul.'

The government loves (not likes) to exaggerate the ethical failings of its opponents but quickly forgets that it is not immune from the same activity.

The comments to this entry are closed.


  • StatCounter
Blog powered by Typepad