I will leave it to the constitutional scholars among us to comment on the decision itself. I only have one question to ask: Who out there predicted that the opinion upholding the mandate would have Chief Justice Roberts as the swing vote?
« Faculty Hiring: UC Davis | Main | Institutionalism and 11-393 »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Not me. I thought it would be 6-3 to uphold, with Roberts writing the majority opinion. I think one could have made a lot of money betting on this outcome.
Posted by: Alfred Brophy | June 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM
Larry Tribe predicted that Roberts would vote to uphold the law.
Posted by: AGR | June 28, 2012 at 01:14 PM