Everyone who teaches first-year crim inevitably teaches the two competing frameworks of the criminal law: the common law v. the Model Penal Code. The frustration is that no one state or jurisdiction follows either framework entirely--usually it's just some complicated melange of the two. Usually I just acknowledge this and move on.
Now, however, Anders Walker, of SLU, has written a paper which explores and complicates this reality, arguing that there is actually a "new common law" that functions in many states:
The New Common Law: Courts, Culture, and the Localization of the Model Penal Code
Few tropes in American law teaching are more firmly entrenched than the criminal law division between Model Penal Code and common law states. Yet, even a cursory look at current state codes indicates that this bifurcation is outmoded. No state continues to cling to ancient English common law, nor does any state adhere fully to the Model Penal Code. In fact, those states that adopted portions of the Code have since produced a substantial body of case law – what this article terms “new common law” – transforming it. Taking the controversial position that criminal law pedagogy is antiquated, this article proposes a radical update, emphasizing two objectives: 1) the need to stress the interplay between individual state cases and codes, and 2) the need to abandon the position that the MPC represents a bold new vision of criminal law reform, particularly since that vision is itself almost half a century old.
Definitely recommended reading for all crim law teachers and scholars!
Comments