... to postpone a pre-trial hearing. Reason?
Click here to find out!
« AALS Travels: In-Flight Reading Suggestions | Main | Deutschman v. Beneficial Corp. Limerick »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Tim--i was trying a case in Alaska and filed my standard brilliant Skadden Arps pretrial motions...hearing was delayed two weeks because my adversary asserted the salmon were running..r
Posted by: roger dennis | October 27, 2010 at 05:41 PM
... and any objection would have prompted this response, "Counselor, you're swimming against the current with that argument."
Posted by: Tim Zinnecker | October 27, 2010 at 07:13 PM
At least these lawyers have their priorities straight!
Posted by: Jacqueline Lipton | October 27, 2010 at 08:36 PM
Doesn't a story like this make the rounds over every major sporting event, particularly when a team is making its first appearance in a big game/series. I recall seeing a similar motion in a Louisiana court right around the Super Bowl in 2010.
Posted by: Howard Wasserman | October 27, 2010 at 09:47 PM