Those of us who have served in the past on dean search committees have probably spent a lot of time thinking about what the school wants in a new dean and occasionally think about what sorts of things about the school might be attractive to dean candidates.
One thing that seems to come up again and again is how attractive it is for a new dean to be able to "reshape" a faculty in terms of faculty hiring - which I suppose could be the case either if the school has open slots and hasn't hired for a while or if the central university is prepared to put aside extra money for a new dean to expand the school faculty-wise (although I don't know how often this really happens).
I'm interested in how important this really is to dean candidates. Do deans want to come to a new school in their first year or two and hire a lot of people? And this assumes a fairly active role by the dean in faculty hiring. I would assume that many deans don't take a particularly active role in hiring, although obviously some do. What is on the top of dean candidates' wish lists? Opportunity to remake the faculty in terms of hires? Challenges of developing fund-raising opportunities? Setting up new centers and programs? Anything else?
I'm not sure what dean candidates *do* want, but from the faculty side, I have my own perspective on what dean candidates *shouldn't* want (or, if they do what to do these things, they aren't high on my list of preferred candidates). A dean shouldn't muck around with the curriculum. A dean shouldn't want something "interesting" or "fun" to do in retirement. I doubt that most candidates want to fundraise, but most faculties want their deans to fundraise -- if not as their #1 priority, then pretty close to the top of the priorities list.
Posted by: Bridget Crawford | September 07, 2010 at 06:49 PM
Bridget - sounds like you've had some bad experiences on the dean front! Fundraising is an interesting point - and of course key to what deans do. I guess one problem for deans is that it can be difficult to fundraise if they don't have anything new and exciting to tell alums. But some of the new and exciting projects can be risky. So can't it end up being a bit of a Catch-22? (Unless you're at a school with a really good sports team and the alums give money to support the school spirit!)
Posted by: Jacqueline Lipton | September 07, 2010 at 08:16 PM
Before moving over to the Provost's office, and while still serving as a law dean - what we refer to in our home as "the good old days" - the Toledo Leadership in Legal Education series published a piece I wrote on "Fit," which I believe is the most important factor that prospective deans ought to seek. The essay is available at http://law.utoledo.edu/students/lawreview/volumes/v40n2/LeBel_final.pdf.
I know this has generated some negative responses - we'll all settle for continuing to be exactly what we have been - but I give faculties and search committees more credit than that.
Posted by: Paul LeBel | September 07, 2010 at 10:53 PM
From past experience talking to Dean candidates, the usual preferences were stated: faculty hiring and building a building. What Dean candidates didn't want to do was to raise money to pay for the previous items that the previous Dean had done.
Posted by: FormerSearchMember | September 10, 2010 at 01:18 PM