Many law professors have activities that they pursue on a part-time basis – things have nothing to do with the law. Some publish novels, while others may paint, act, sing, or perform with a band. Others may even work as part-time models (although I do not personally know of any). My questions for the day are: (1) what sorts of extracurricular activities do you indulge in (besides blogging); (2) what sorts of activities (besides those of the obviously illegal or unseemly variety) would be frowned upon at your law school; and (3) what sorts of moonlighting activities would be deal breakers when considering extending offers to law faculty candidates?
Oh, that picture!!! Aren't they just the bees knees! I have such a soft spot for seeing now-older actors in their youthful days. Thanks for this.
As to your actual question, I don't think there are any activities that a faculty should or could legitimately disapprove of. Right? We're academics, so teaching, service, scholarship are all that matter. Am I missing something?
Posted by: Vladimir | March 09, 2010 at 12:55 PM
Conservative politics- deal breaker
Progressive politics- game on
Posted by: Obviously anon | March 09, 2010 at 01:26 PM
Extracurriculars are very healthy for law profs. Mine include:
1. Taking a weekly singing workshop at a local adult education center for 14+ years. I wrote a guest column about the experience for the Boston Globe a few years ago: http://www.boston.com/news/globe/education/articles/2004/05/30/note_of_understanding/
2. I'm learning how to storm chase -- I've been fascinated with tornadoes since I was a kid -- finally went on a storm chase tour in 2008 and 2009 and scheduled to go again this summer. Here's a blog entry I wrote on my first chase tour: http://newworkplace.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/labors-of-love-chasing-tornadoes/
David Yamada
Suffolk
Posted by: David Yamada | March 09, 2010 at 05:44 PM
Love this post! Thanks! As for deal breakers, I can think of some activities, that while legal, would likely be offensive to many members of a faulty. While I recognize such an approach is a potentially dangerous path, I do think people act in such a fashion, despite references to teaching, service, and scholarhip.
I, for instance, love training in the martials arts. Knowledge of such activities have helped considerably with student classroom conduct as well as in debates with colleagues(he writes with an evil smile).
Posted by: Ediberto Roman | March 09, 2010 at 05:49 PM
Very interesting, David! Both of these activities require a lot of bravery. ;-)
An advisory to all: Please also note that the first sentence in my post is missing a "that" -- "Many law professors have activities that they pursue on a part-time basis – things THAT have nothing to do with the law."
Posted by: Kelly Anders | March 09, 2010 at 05:50 PM
Thanks, Ediberto. Martial arts would be very...useful. (smiles) How long have you been training? Who do you think would win in a match between Jackie Chan and Bruce Lee?
Posted by: Kelly Anders | March 09, 2010 at 05:54 PM
Holy crap, David Yamada! I have quietly dreamed of storm-chasing for years now! This might make me get up and do it (if I can persuade my wife that such activity is not grounds for divorce under North Carolina law.)
As for my own extracurriculars, see http://www.the-retrobates.com. Coming soon to a bar near you!
I'm also in a barbershop quartet with three other lawprofs (whom I shall not name publicly, in order to protect the reputations of Jim Salzman, Victor Flatt, and Holning Lau).
Kelly asked whether there are moonlighting activities that would be deal breakers in considering entry-level candidates. I hate to admit it, but I do think that Obviously Anon has at least the tangent of a point. It's inaccurate (even unfair) to say, as Obviously Anon does, that any "conservative" political activity is a deal breaker. But if an entry-level candidate came through who, for example, had a leadership position in an organization that pickets sites where abortions are performed, or who spent every weekend as a Confederate Army reenactor playing the role of Jeb Stuart, I do think eyebrows would be raised.
Posted by: Eric Muller | March 10, 2010 at 06:31 AM
"...bringing sexy back to the cul-de-sac." I love it! It's hard to fathom that music from the eighties and nineties has become "retro." (smiles) What sorts of tunes do you cover?
As for the examples of deal-breaking behavior, I wonder if some schools might also look askance at faculty who become "too famous" from their extracurricular activities -- even those of the mild variety.
Posted by: Kelly Anders | March 10, 2010 at 10:09 AM
Eric, storm chasing is relatively safe when done responsibly. I chase with Tempest Tours, which employs knowledgeable, veteran chasers who are not reckless in their pursuit of stormy weather. (Of course, the liability waiver each guest has to sign does go on a bit...)
Posted by: David Yamada | March 10, 2010 at 02:18 PM
Some time ago, I really needed to buy a good house for my corporation but I did not have enough cash and couldn't order anything. Thank heaven my brother adviced to try to take the home loans at creditors. Thus, I did that and was satisfied with my consolidation loan.
Posted by: Delgado19Olga | April 07, 2010 at 01:41 AM