I don't know if people outside of Ohio have heard about the situation this week in the case of Romell Broom who was to be executed earlier this week for a murder committed some 25 years ago. The governor was forced to order a temporary halt to the execution when the execution team was physically unable to insert shunts into the inmate's veins through which the lethal injections would be applied. The execution team apparently tried to insert the shunts for 2 hours and then the governor was called. A reprieve has been granted until sometime next week, although it was not clear from the news reports exactly how this matter will proceed. A report from the Cleveland Plain Dealer is here. Has this ever happened before in other death penalty states? Is there a protocol for it? It's obviously troubling on a number of levels, not the least of which is how one might feel about the death penalty in the first place.
Jacqueline,
I'm sure Doug Berman over at Sentencing Law and Policy has discussed previous if not similar botched attempts before but I don't have the time now to search for the links. However, readers may want to follow his posts and links to the Broom case in particular, the latest of which is here: http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2009/09/inmate-will-testify-about-failed-execution.html#comments
Posted by: Patrick S. O'Donnell | September 18, 2009 at 12:19 PM
This is not unusual, and it's the third time in three years in Ohio. Other states where botched executions from lethal injection have taken place include Texas, Illinois, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Indiana, South Carolina, Nevada, Florida and Georgia. Some of the best-known examples, compiled by Michael Radelet, are here: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/some-examples-post-furman-botched-executions
In Ohio three years ago, for example: "it took 22 minutes for the execution technicians to find a vein suitable for insertion of the catheter. But three or four minutes thereafter, as the vein collapsed and Clark's arm began to swell, he raised his head off the gurney and said five times, "It don’t work. It don’t work." The curtains surrounding the gurney were then closed while the technicians worked for 30 minutes to find another vein. Media witnesses later reported that they heard 'moaning, crying out and guttural noises.' Finally, death was pronounced almost 90 minutes after the execution began."
Posted by: Stephanie Farrior | September 18, 2009 at 12:40 PM
One wonders how many stories we'll hear like this before we realize the death penalty is inherently cruel.
Posted by: Ammon | September 18, 2009 at 01:32 PM
At the risk of being obtuse, I'd call this a negligible issue. Coerced confessions and fabricated evidence as well as insufficient preparation of mitigation in resisting the imposition of the death penalty in the courtroom are the primary issues -- I'll venture that few people to whom a death sentence is administered will have devoted much thought to minimizing the physical suffering they inflicted on their victims in the course of the crimes for which they are ultimately executed.
Posted by: Michael Greco | March 21, 2010 at 12:58 AM