Thanks to some serious new theoretical work by Jorge Cham here, we can finally end the debates about scholarly impact. Cham proposes a formula that captures most of the relevant issues and inputs. This is sure to clarify tenure decisions for years to come!
Search the Lounge
Categories
- AALS
- ABA
- Academia
- Accreditation
- Administrative Announcements
- Advertising
- African American History and Law
- Airline News and Views
- ALI
- Arts and Culture
- Bar Examinations
- Beyond Categorization
- Blogs and Blogging
- Board Diversity
- Books
- Business Organizations
- Calls for Papers
- Clerkships
- Conference News
- Constitutional History
- Constitutional Law
- Criminal Law
- Culture of Commerce
- Current Affairs
- Deans
- Death Penalty
- Disability Rights
- Distance Education
- Economy and Markets
- Education
- Elections and Voting
- Ethics
- Eugenics
- European Financial Crisis
- Faculty Compensation
- Fairness and Justice
- Family Law
- Fear
- Fellowships
- Film
- Financial Market Regulation
- Food and Drink
- Food, Arts & Culture
- Funny Stuff
- Games
- Gender
- GLBT
- Harper Lee Symposium
- Health
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Internet
- Journalism
- Judiciary
- Language
- Law and Economics
- Law Firms and Practice
- Law Reviews
- Law School Deans
- Law School Hiring
- Law School News
- Law School Rankings
- Legal Education
- Legal History
- Literature and Law
- Memorial Notices
- Monuments
- Music
- News Media
- Nineteenth Century History
- Non-Law School Hiring
- Pedagogy and Assessment
- Photo Archive
- Politics
- Privacy
- Property
- Race
- Rankings
- Recent Scholarship
- Religion
- Religion and Faith
- Reparations
- Reproductive Markets
- Scholarship Strategy
- Science
- Sentencing
- Sexuality
- Slavery
- Sociology
- Sporting Life
- Sports
- Starting A Law School
- Stuff You Can't Categorize
- Supreme Court
- Taboo Trades
- Teaching
- Television
- Terrorism
- Travel
- Trusts and Estates
- University News
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- Writing/Clinic Faculty Searches
Reading Room
- Above The Law
- Adjunct Law Prof Blog
- Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog
- Balkinization
- Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
- Brian Leiter's Legal Philosophy Blog
- Brian Leiter's Nietzsche Blog
- Business Law Prof Blog
- Cambridge University Press NA Blog
- Capital Defense Weekly
- Chris Uggen's Weblog
- CLR FORUM
- Commercial Law
- Concurring Opinions
- Conglomerate
- Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Books
- CrimProf Blog
- Dorf on Law
- Election Law
- Empirical Legal Studies
- Feminist Law Professors
- First Amendment Law Prof
- Gender & Sexuality Law Blog
- Harvard University Press Blog
- How Appealing
- Ideoblog
- Info/Law
- Institutional Review Blog
- IntLawGrrls
- Law Librarian Blog
- Law School Innovation
- Law, Economics & Cycling
- Legal History Blog
- Legal Scholarship Blog
- Legal Theory Blog
- Madisonian
- Mirror of Justice
- MoneyLaw
- Nancy Rapoport's Blogspot
- NYU Press Blog
- Opinio Juris
- OUP Blog
- PrawfsBlawg
- Professor Bainbridge
- PropertyProf
- Ratio Juris
- ReligiousLeftLaw
- Reproductive Rights Prof
- scatterplot
- SCOTUSblog
- Sentencing Law and Policy
- Sports Law Blog
- TaxProf
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- The Right Coast
- The Situationist
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Truth on the Market
- Turtle Talk
- University of California Press Blog
- University of Chicago Press Blog
- Voir Dire
- White Collar Crime Prof Blog
- Word on the Streeterville
- Workplace Prof
- WSJ Law Blog
- Yale Press Log
« The Source of Perry Miller's Heart versus Head? | Main | Francis Daniel Pastorius Conference »
December 10, 2008
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Comments
- Patrick S. O'Donnell on Alan Brinkley
- Patrick S. O'Donnell on Alan Brinkley
- Patrick S. O'Donnell on University of Vienna Symposium on Polyamory in the Media and Personal Poly Identity
- Patrick S. O'Donnell on University of Vienna Symposium on Polyamory in the Media and Personal Poly Identity
- Patrick S. O'Donnell on University of Vienna Symposium on Polyamory in the Media and Personal Poly Identity
- Greg Crespi on Why Reducing Law School Debt Will Not Increase Public Interest Work
- Jennifer Brobst on Why Reducing Law School Debt Will Not Increase Public Interest Work
- Steve L. on Why Reducing Law School Debt Will Not Increase Public Interest Work
- Joan Howarth on Why Reducing Law School Debt Will Not Increase Public Interest Work
- Greg Crespi on Why Reducing Law School Debt Will Not Increase Public Interest Work
Bloggers
Bloggers Emereti
Guests, Current and Past
- Adam Benforado
- Beth Haas
- Beth Thornburg
- Bill Reynolds
- Brando Starkey
- Brian Clarke
- Brian Sawers
- C. Scott Pryor
- Cassandra Burke Robertson
- Daniel Sokol
- David J.R. Frakt
- David Orentlicher
- David S. Cohen
- David Yellen
- Derek W. Black
- Diane Curtis
- Donald Tibbs
- Ediberto Roman
- Ediberto Román
- Elizabeth M. Glazer
- Elizabeth R. Dale
- Eric Chaffee
- Eric Chiappinelli
- Franita Tolson
- Gary Rosin
- Greg McNeal
- Gregg D. Polsky
- Jeff Lipshaw
- Jessie Hill
- Jessie Owley
- John Inazu
- John Kang
- Joshua Stein
- Kathy Stanchi
- Kelly Anders
- Marc Roark
- Mark C. Weidemaier
- Matt Lister
- Michael Higdon
- Michael J. Madison
- Michael Lewyn
- Michelle Meyer
- Miriam Cherry
- Nancy Rapoport
- Nareissa Smith
- Patrick S. O'Donnell
- Paul McGreal
- Phil Pucillo
- Ralph Clifford
- Ray Campbell
- Richard Gershon
- Rita Trivedi
- Robert Heverly
- Robert Spitzer
- Roger Dennis
- Sarah Lawsky
- Scott Taylor
- Sharona Hoffman
- Sheila B. Scheuerman
- Steven Lubet
- Taja-Nia Y. Henderson
- Tamara Piety
- Tommy Crocker
- Tuan Samahon
Comments