The last week in September is the week the American Library Association has set aside to raise awareness about book censorship. On the positive side, when the ALA first designated Banned Books week, in 1982, hundreds of books were being removed from library shelves in any given year. Last year, the number was only 40, according to Judith F. Krug, director of ALA's Office of Intellectual Freedom. In commemoration of Banned Books Week, many libraries across America are reading from once (and current) banned books. If you want to learn more, including interesting information like banned book events near you (go to a reading!) and the frequency of challenges to books written by authors of color, check out the ALA's banned books site here.
Instead of a link, I thought it important enough to put the most frequently challenged books of 2007 right in this post. Notice a pattern? I did (more on that later). If you want to see other lists, include the most challenged books of the 21st Century, go to the ALA site, which is very informative:
Most Frequently Challenged Books of 2007
1. And Tango Makes Three, by Justin Richardson/Peter Parnell. Picture book. (this book is about two male penguins who raise a baby penguin from a hetero penguin couple). Reasons: anti-ethnic, sexism, homosexuality, anti-family, religious viewpoint, unsuited to age group.
2. The Chocolate War, by Robert Cormier. Youth novel. Reasons: sexually explicit, offensive language, violence.
3. Olive's Ocean, by Kevin Henkes. Youth novel. Reasons: sexually explicit and offensive language.
4. The Golden Compass, by Philip Pullman. Youth novel. Reason: Religious viewpoint.
5. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain. Novel. Reason: racism.
6. The Color Purple, by Alice Walker. Novel. Reasons: homosexuality, sexually explicit, offensive language.
7. TTYL, by Lauren Myracle. Youth novel. Reasons: sexually explicit, offensive language, unsuited to age group.
8. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, by Maya Angelou. Novel. Reason: sexually explicit.
9. It's Perfectly Normal, by Robie H. Harris. Youth nonfiction. Reasons: sex education, sexually explicit.
10. The Perks of Being a Wallflower, by Stephen Chbosky. Novel. Reasons: homosexuality, sexually explicit, offensive language, unsuited to age group.
This is fascinating. Thank you for drawing attention to this.
Some of my favorite lower and middle school authors are on the most-frequently-challenged list (Dahl! Blume! Paterson!). I'm hopeful that, as you note, the number of challenged books only continues to decrease.
As for 2007's challenges to sex talk, I'm stumped on how to make these discussions (explorations?) more "acceptable". Maybe if more adults (and especially parents - who, according to the ALA link, were the most likely to challenge) come to grips with their sexual selves, the less likely they will fear the public debate.
Posted by: Sarah S. | September 30, 2008 at 11:08 AM
Re BBW, see also http://preview.tinyurl.com/sowell for another view.
Posted by: Dan Kleinman | September 30, 2008 at 11:14 PM
Thanks, Dan. Interesting view. I still tend to think that Banned Books Week is more than "shameless propoganda" for two reasons. One, we should remember that in the past, books have been banned, and for not good reasons. Knowledge of history is good for us (maybe that's why we won't make the same mistakes). Two, the books that are challenged for being "age inappropriate" mean that the challenging parents think that no one's kids of that age should see the book. They are not simply saying that they don't want their kids to see the book. That kind of universalizing of your opinion about certain reading material is troubling to me, and certainly is a kind of censorship.
PS My public library in Southern NJ carries Limbaugh's books (3 books). They also carry Audre Lorde (1 book). As I often do, I find that the accusations of "reverse discrimination" from the right simply don't hold water.
Posted by: Kathy Stanchi | October 01, 2008 at 11:20 AM