The organizers of the Penny Pether Law & Language Scholarship Award for 2016 have issued these announcements:
The winner of the Penny Pether Law & Language Scholarship Award for 2016 is Stephen Paskey, Telling Refugee Stories: Trauma, Credibility, and Adversarial Adjudication of Claims for Asylum, 56 Santa Clara L. Rev. 457 (2016). The committee reviewed 25 nominated articles, and we struggled to identify a winner due to the high quality and strong diversity in the scholarship. We congratulate Professor Paskey, and we thank all the nominees for participating.
Call for Nominations: The Penny Pether Law & Language Scholarship Award 2017
A passionate advocate for interdisciplinary scholarship in law, literature, and language, Penelope J. Pether (1957-2013) was Professor of Law at Villanova University School of Law and former Professor of Law and Director of Legal Rhetoric at the American University Washington College of Law. Her own scholarship focused not only on law, literature, and language, but also on constitutional and comparative constitutional law; legal theory, including constitutional theory; common law legal institutions, judging practices, and professional subject formation.
Beginning in November 2013, the Penny Pether Award for Law & Language Scholarship has been given annually to an article or essay published during the preceding year (September 1 to September 1) that exemplifies Penny’s commitment to law and language scholarship and pedagogy.
The Committee selecting award recipients from among the articles and essays nominated will look for scholarship that not only embodies Penny’s passion and spirit but also has some or all of the following characteristics:
1. “[S]cholarship concerning itself with the unique or distinctive insights that might emerge from interdisciplinary inquiries into ‘law’ grounded in the work of influential theorists of language and discourse.”
2. Scholarship that “attempts to think through the relations among subject formation, language, and law.”
3. Scholarship that provides “accounts of—and linguistic interventions in—acute and yet abiding crises in law, its institutions and discourses.”
4. Scholarship and pedagogy, including work addressing injustices in legal-academic institutions and practices, that is “[c]arefully theorized and situated, insisting on engaging politics and law, [and that] charts ways for law and its subjects to use power, do justice.”
More explanations and descriptions of these characteristics can be found in Penny’s chapter from which these quotations are drawn: Language, in Law and the Humanities: An Introduction (Austin Sarat et al. eds., Cambridge U. Press 2010).
Nominations should be sent by January 8, 2018, to J. Amy Dillard at email@example.com. You are free to nominate more than one work and to nominate work you’ve written. Please provide a citation and a pdf for each work you nominate.
We are shifting our definition of the preceding year to simply our process. But in this year of transition, for the 2017 prize, we will consider any work published between September 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. In the future, we will work with a calendar year.
The Selection Committee includes Linda Berger, David Caudill, Amy Dillard, Bruce Hay, Ian Gallacher, Melissa Marlow, Jeremy Mullem, Nancy Modesitt, Stephen Paskey, and Terrill Pollman.
Members of the Selection Committee are not eligible for the award.