Search the Lounge

Categories

« The Deportation of Rasmea Odeh: Two Newspapers, Same Event, Different Stories | Main | Does Denying Gay Man a Medical Expense Deduction for Costs of IVF Violate Equal Protection? 11th Cir. Says No »

September 25, 2017

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

[M][a][c][K]

A decade and a bit ago, before the full rise of EDTx I did an analysis for Japanese clients of the degree to which they tended to suffer from xenophobia in patent cases, and later updated it as a tech GC. In broad terms the results were:

1. Stay north of the Mason/Dixon line;
2. Try to be in major metropolitan areas;
3. Judges are better than juries except in EDVA (especially outside Alexandria);
4. All things being equal, you’re better off in a district with a highly educated jury pool, especially one with a lot of STEM graduates.

Patent litigation risks are something companies consider when making investments. It’s not inconceivable that one effect of TC Heartland would be to deter international tech companies from investing in districts seen as overly pro-patient plaintiff.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Bloggers Emereti

StatCounter

  • StatCounter
Blog powered by Typepad