Charles Reichmann of U.C. Berkeley makes the case in his new paper, Anti-Chinese Racism at Berkeley: The Case for Re-naming Boalt Hall. Cribbing now from the abstract:
Those familiar with UC Berkeley School of Law know its traditional name and the name of its primary classroom building - Boalt Hall. Yet few know much about the man who gave the law school its name. A close look at John Boalt’s legacy, however, calls out for a reexamination of the law school’s continued association with Boalt, given the contrast between UC Berkeley’s stated values and Boalt’s influential views that the Chinese were an unassimilable race that ought to be excluded from the United States. Boalt's racial theories were identical to John C. Calhoun's, whose name Yale University recently removed from a residential college on the grounds that Calhoun's principles and legacy are at odds with Yale's mission and values. Through his widely-circulated and virulently racist 1877 address "The Chinese Question" and his proposal for a plebiscite on further immigration, Boalt was instrumental in catalyzing support for the Chinese Exclusion Act.
Back in 2010 I published a short paper that assesses some of the factors one ought to consider in renaming. And if I can ever get back to work on scholarship, I will have something to say about this in the context of Saunders Hall on UNC's campus.