Search the Lounge

« The Resurrection of Nat Turner | Main | The Changing Law School Learning Experience »

February 08, 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jennifer S. Taub

Tamara, also of interest is the SDNY decision in August.

Quoting: "At first blush, the New York cases appear to be in tension with Fait. In reality, there is no conflict — the New York cases do not treat credit ratings as pure statements of either fact or opinion but rather as a hybrid of the two. These opinions hold that ratings are actionable because they are understood to be statements of creditworthiness based on an analysis of underlying facts conducted by respected ratings organizations."


The comments to this entry are closed.

Bloggers Emereti


  • StatCounter
Blog powered by Typepad