« Faculty Hiring: UC Davis |
| Institutionalism and 11-393 »
I will leave it to the constitutional scholars among us to comment on the decision itself. I only have one question to ask: Who out there predicted that the opinion upholding the mandate would have Chief Justice Roberts as the swing vote?
Posted by Ralph D. Clifford at 11:37 AM in Constitutional Law, Current Affairs, Judiciary, Supreme Court | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f871a9c8833017742cd2049970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NFIB v. Sebelius:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Not me. I thought it would be 6-3 to uphold, with Roberts writing the majority opinion. I think one could have made a lot of money betting on this outcome.
Alfred Brophy |
June 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM
Larry Tribe predicted that Roberts would vote to uphold the law.
June 28, 2012 at 01:14 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.