Here.
« Historian Loose in Public? | Main | Does the Economics of Law Practice Matter to Law Schools? »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f871a9c8833015438716063970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More on Law Schools from the NYT:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
You have to wonder about Segal's journalistic skills. He uses Duncan as an example of a school that is trying to provide low cost legal education for students in the Knoxville area. Their tuition is $28.6K per year and students are advised to be able to come up with $50K per year for tuition. Room, board books and fees at Duncan. Meanwhile down the road in Knoxville at the University of Tennessee tuition for state residents is $14.1K per year and the school says that $35K should cover the same things for which Dincan recommends $50K. Most of us are aware of the fact that it is fairly common for struggling private universities to found law schools as profit centers. Maybe Segal should look a little harder at the books and what is going on here. Sure, I know that Tennessee receives a subsidy from the state. That is not the issue. The issue right now in a world crowded with lawyers, what is the most economical choice for a student?
Posted by: Bill Turnier | December 19, 2011 at 01:47 PM