Search the Lounge

« The Demand For Islamic Derivatives Contracts | Main | Amy Bishop Insane Claims Lawyer . . . Thanks to Harvard »

February 21, 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


No need for the hypo when you have the Leonard v. Pepsico reality.

Miriam A. Cherry

True enough; it would be a hypo in addition to/a supplement for Leonard v. Pepsico.

Howard Wasserman

More generally, there" Laura Little's "Regulating Funny: Humor and the Law," in Cornell Law Review and

The comments to this entry are closed.

Bloggers Emereti


  • StatCounter
Blog powered by Typepad