Search the Lounge

« The Demand For Islamic Derivatives Contracts | Main | Amy Bishop Insane Claims Lawyer . . . Thanks to Harvard »

February 21, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

u

No need for the hypo when you have the Leonard v. Pepsico reality.

Miriam A. Cherry

True enough; it would be a hypo in addition to/a supplement for Leonard v. Pepsico.

Howard Wasserman

More generally, there" Laura Little's "Regulating Funny: Humor and the Law," in Cornell Law Review and http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1124627.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Bloggers Emereti

StatCounter

  • StatCounter
Blog powered by Typepad